https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171055 Writ petitions challenging termination of a dealership were not maintainable where the same dispute had already been referred to arbitration under the dealership agreement and the arbitral process had concluded against the appellants. The Court treated the pursuit of writ and arbitration remedies over the same controversy as impermissible parallel proceedings, and upheld dismissal of the writ petitions. The earlier dismissal was therefore justified. en-us Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:45:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171055 Writ petitions challenging termination of a dealership were not maintainable where the same dispute had already been referred to arbitration under the dealership agreement and the arbitral process had concluded against the appellants. The Court treated the pursuit of writ and arbitration remedies over the same controversy as impermissible parallel proceedings, and upheld dismissal of the writ petitions. The earlier dismissal was therefore justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171055