https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261316 Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act and Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act confer an additional, plaintiff-convenience-based forum, enlarging the ordinary territorial rule under Section 20 CPC. That special forum is limited by the statutory scheme and object: it is meant to remove hardship, not to permit unrestricted forum shopping or suit at an unrelated place. Where the plaintiff carries on business at the place where the cause of action has arisen, the suit should ordinarily be brought there, and a branch or subordinate office at a distant place does not by itself create territorial jurisdiction if no part of the cause of action arose there. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261316 Section 62(2) of the Copyright Act and Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act confer an additional, plaintiff-convenience-based forum, enlarging the ordinary territorial rule under Section 20 CPC. That special forum is limited by the statutory scheme and object: it is meant to remove hardship, not to permit unrestricted forum shopping or suit at an unrelated place. Where the plaintiff carries on business at the place where the cause of action has arisen, the suit should ordinarily be brought there, and a branch or subordinate office at a distant place does not by itself create territorial jurisdiction if no part of the cause of action arose there. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261316