https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171047 A prohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 did not by itself create a right to automatic absorption of contract labour by the principal employer. The governing principle was that any claim to regularisation depends on the factual genuineness of the contract and whether the arrangement is a camouflage, matters for examination by the industrial adjudicatory forum. The Court also noted that prior directions for absorption had not been implemented, so the prospective operation of the earlier Constitution Bench ruling did not assist the workmen. In view of the unresolved factual disputes, recourse to conciliation and, if necessary, reference to the Industrial Tribunal was proper. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:15:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171047 A prohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 did not by itself create a right to automatic absorption of contract labour by the principal employer. The governing principle was that any claim to regularisation depends on the factual genuineness of the contract and whether the arrangement is a camouflage, matters for examination by the industrial adjudicatory forum. The Court also noted that prior directions for absorption had not been implemented, so the prospective operation of the earlier Constitution Bench ruling did not assist the workmen. In view of the unresolved factual disputes, recourse to conciliation and, if necessary, reference to the Industrial Tribunal was proper. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171047