https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171046 A pension reduction notice under Article 470(b) was not liable to be quashed merely because related disciplinary allegations had earlier featured in proceedings set aside only for lack of opportunity on punishment; the charges were not disturbed on merits, and the pension regulations still permitted adverse action subject to notice and hearing. The Court also held that a later notice gave rise to a fresh cause of action, so a miscellaneous application could not be used to reopen a writ petition that had already been finally disposed of. The proper course was a separate challenge under Article 226. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:12:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171046 A pension reduction notice under Article 470(b) was not liable to be quashed merely because related disciplinary allegations had earlier featured in proceedings set aside only for lack of opportunity on punishment; the charges were not disturbed on merits, and the pension regulations still permitted adverse action subject to notice and hearing. The Court also held that a later notice gave rise to a fresh cause of action, so a miscellaneous application could not be used to reopen a writ petition that had already been finally disposed of. The proper course was a separate challenge under Article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171046