<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1124 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171044</link>
    <description>A High Court hearing an election petition may examine the validity of a law, including citizenship-related disqualification questions, when that issue is necessary to decide a ground under the election law and is properly pleaded. A certificate of citizenship under Section 5(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act is not conclusive; it raises only a rebuttable presumption and does not bar a plea that the returned candidate was not an Indian citizen or was otherwise disqualified. However, an election petition must still plead concise material facts and disclose a genuine triable cause of action. Vague, unsupported assertions are insufficient, and petitions lacking factual foundation may be rejected at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 12:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1124 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171044</link>
      <description>A High Court hearing an election petition may examine the validity of a law, including citizenship-related disqualification questions, when that issue is necessary to decide a ground under the election law and is properly pleaded. A certificate of citizenship under Section 5(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act is not conclusive; it raises only a rebuttable presumption and does not bar a plea that the returned candidate was not an Indian citizen or was otherwise disqualified. However, an election petition must still plead concise material facts and disclose a genuine triable cause of action. Vague, unsupported assertions are insufficient, and petitions lacking factual foundation may be rejected at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>