https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171040 The Supreme Court found in favor of the appellants, concluding that the High Court erred in dismissing the writ petitions on the ground of alternative remedy. It held that the petitions were maintainable, the allotments were legal under existing regulations, and the cancellation was unjustified. The Court noted violations of natural justice and discrimination, remitting the matter back to the High Court for reevaluation within six weeks, with an interim stay on dispossession. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171040 The Supreme Court found in favor of the appellants, concluding that the High Court erred in dismissing the writ petitions on the ground of alternative remedy. It held that the petitions were maintainable, the allotments were legal under existing regulations, and the cancellation was unjustified. The Court noted violations of natural justice and discrimination, remitting the matter back to the High Court for reevaluation within six weeks, with an interim stay on dispossession. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171040