<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 567 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions on account of storage charges receivable, disallowance of prior period expenses, disallowance of prior period income, and disallowance of depreciation. The Tribunal also upheld the direction not to tax the subsidy and to reduce income by excess depreciation. However, the Tribunal disagreed with the confirmation of disallowance of employer&#039;s contribution to P.F. and disallowance of professional fees, allowing them as per relevant provisions of the Act. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Cross Objection of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 567 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions on account of storage charges receivable, disallowance of prior period expenses, disallowance of prior period income, and disallowance of depreciation. The Tribunal also upheld the direction not to tax the subsidy and to reduce income by excess depreciation. However, the Tribunal disagreed with the confirmation of disallowance of employer&#039;s contribution to P.F. and disallowance of professional fees, allowing them as per relevant provisions of the Act. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Cross Objection of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>