<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 979 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171012</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation for delay, allowing the matter to be considered on merits. The Special Leave Petition was then not entertained and stood dismissed, with no detailed reasons recorded. In the same order, the Court granted limited procedural relief by extending the time for making the previously ordered deposit by four weeks from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 979 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171012</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation for delay, allowing the matter to be considered on merits. The Special Leave Petition was then not entertained and stood dismissed, with no detailed reasons recorded. In the same order, the Court granted limited procedural relief by extending the time for making the previously ordered deposit by four weeks from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>