https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171006 The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty on boiler ash, bagasse, and press mud, ruling in favor of the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer. It held that boiler ash did not qualify as excisable goods based on precedent. The decision highlighted the necessity of complying with Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate accounts for exempted goods when availing credits for common inputs. The case outcome was influenced by the interpretation of relevant rules and the application of established legal principles from prior judgments. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171006 The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty on boiler ash, bagasse, and press mud, ruling in favor of the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer. It held that boiler ash did not qualify as excisable goods based on precedent. The decision highlighted the necessity of complying with Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate accounts for exempted goods when availing credits for common inputs. The case outcome was influenced by the interpretation of relevant rules and the application of established legal principles from prior judgments. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171006