<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171030</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging the Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustment, focusing on the comparability of Genesys International as a comparable entity. The Tribunal adjusted the Profit Level Indicators between 20% and 32.8% to reach a fair decision at 23%, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the adjustment accordingly. This case underscores the significance of evaluating functional comparability in Transfer Pricing analysis for accurate Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:53:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1157 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171030</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal challenging the Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustment, focusing on the comparability of Genesys International as a comparable entity. The Tribunal adjusted the Profit Level Indicators between 20% and 32.8% to reach a fair decision at 23%, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the adjustment accordingly. This case underscores the significance of evaluating functional comparability in Transfer Pricing analysis for accurate Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>