<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1150 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 1,35,22,144 to the assessee&#039;s total income due to insufficient evidence supporting corporate cost allocation expenses. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of providing necessary evidence to support expenditure claims. The case underscores the significance of complying with evidentiary requirements for income assessment and expense claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:55:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1150 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 1,35,22,144 to the assessee&#039;s total income due to insufficient evidence supporting corporate cost allocation expenses. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of providing necessary evidence to support expenditure claims. The case underscores the significance of complying with evidentiary requirements for income assessment and expense claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>