<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1154 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, upholding the first appellate authority&#039;s decisions regarding non-deduction of tax on subcontracted work for a hydro electricity project. The Tribunal emphasized the factual circumstances, including the absence of direct payments to subcontractors and financial constraints, leading to the cancellation of penalty under section 221.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1154 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, upholding the first appellate authority&#039;s decisions regarding non-deduction of tax on subcontracted work for a hydro electricity project. The Tribunal emphasized the factual circumstances, including the absence of direct payments to subcontractors and financial constraints, leading to the cancellation of penalty under section 221.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>