<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1161 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of advertisement expenses, finding them genuine and supported by proper documentation. The Tribunal also found no violation of Rule 46A and dismissed the Cross objection regarding the validity of reopening under section 147 as it was not pressed during the proceedings. Both the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s Cross objection were ultimately dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1161 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of advertisement expenses, finding them genuine and supported by proper documentation. The Tribunal also found no violation of Rule 46A and dismissed the Cross objection regarding the validity of reopening under section 147 as it was not pressed during the proceedings. Both the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s Cross objection were ultimately dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>