<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1162 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171035</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the 3% income estimation for the assessee. The decision was based on the change in business activity from stockist to consignee of vehicles, resulting in a lower profit margin and reduced risk. The CIT(A) justified the lower estimation by analyzing the financial data and emphasizing the need for reasonable assessments in best judgment scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:14:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1162 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171035</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the 3% income estimation for the assessee. The decision was based on the change in business activity from stockist to consignee of vehicles, resulting in a lower profit margin and reduced risk. The CIT(A) justified the lower estimation by analyzing the financial data and emphasizing the need for reasonable assessments in best judgment scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>