<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 276 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261315</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition with liberty to seek review does not bind the High Court to entertain or allow the review; any review petition must be considered independently on its own merits. The Supreme Court acceded to the request to withdraw the SLP with liberty to file review before the High Court, while expressly clarifying that such liberty is not a mandate to grant review. The order also records that delay was condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 276 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261315</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition with liberty to seek review does not bind the High Court to entertain or allow the review; any review petition must be considered independently on its own merits. The Supreme Court acceded to the request to withdraw the SLP with liberty to file review before the High Court, while expressly clarifying that such liberty is not a mandate to grant review. The order also records that delay was condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>