<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 266 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261305</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding duty evasion and inclusion of service charges in duty calculation. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s application of the extended period of limitation for duty evasion pre-August 1996 due to suppression but set aside the demand post-August 1996 as the Department was aware of the activities. The Court affirmed that suppression cannot coexist with knowledge, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the Revenue for the period prior to August 1996.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 266 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261305</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding duty evasion and inclusion of service charges in duty calculation. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s application of the extended period of limitation for duty evasion pre-August 1996 due to suppression but set aside the demand post-August 1996 as the Department was aware of the activities. The Court affirmed that suppression cannot coexist with knowledge, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the Revenue for the period prior to August 1996.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>