https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261303 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to examine and permit the cross-examination of key witnesses, including Shri Dinesh Sharma and the Member Secretary, Single Window Clearance Agency. The Authority was directed to determine whether the unit commenced commercial production by the specified date based on the evidence presented, aiming to conclude the process within 90 days. The appeals were disposed of with the judgment announced on 24/06/2015. en-us Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261303 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to examine and permit the cross-examination of key witnesses, including Shri Dinesh Sharma and the Member Secretary, Single Window Clearance Agency. The Authority was directed to determine whether the unit commenced commercial production by the specified date based on the evidence presented, aiming to conclude the process within 90 days. The appeals were disposed of with the judgment announced on 24/06/2015. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261303