<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 262 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant but upheld the demand for Cenvat credit on cleared inputs. The decision regarding the remaining demand on stock was also upheld. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal providing a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and factual circumstances involved in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 262 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant but upheld the demand for Cenvat credit on cleared inputs. The decision regarding the remaining demand on stock was also upheld. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal providing a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and factual circumstances involved in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>