<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 259 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261298</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled that a stay order on appeal would persist until the appeal is disposed of, based on the precedent set by a previous case. The Tribunal clarified that there is no need for additional applications for extension of stay when the appeal remains pending beyond a specified date, as per the law. The judgment emphasized the continuity of stay orders and the obligation to dispose of appeals within three years of granting a stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 06:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 259 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261298</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled that a stay order on appeal would persist until the appeal is disposed of, based on the precedent set by a previous case. The Tribunal clarified that there is no need for additional applications for extension of stay when the appeal remains pending beyond a specified date, as per the law. The judgment emphasized the continuity of stay orders and the obligation to dispose of appeals within three years of granting a stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>