<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 257 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under the SEBI Act for violating PFUTP Regulations but modified it to &amp;amp;8377; 10 lakh for each appellant, totaling &amp;amp;8377; 20 lakh. The appellants engaged in manipulative trading practices, including self-trades and synchronized trading, creating artificial market signals. Despite procedural non-compliance, the penalty was reduced due to the appellants&#039; limited control over other group members&#039; trading accounts. The judgment emphasized the importance of fairness in penalty imposition and set a two-month deadline for payment, allowing for recovery actions if not met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 257 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under the SEBI Act for violating PFUTP Regulations but modified it to &amp;amp;8377; 10 lakh for each appellant, totaling &amp;amp;8377; 20 lakh. The appellants engaged in manipulative trading practices, including self-trades and synchronized trading, creating artificial market signals. Despite procedural non-compliance, the penalty was reduced due to the appellants&#039; limited control over other group members&#039; trading accounts. The judgment emphasized the importance of fairness in penalty imposition and set a two-month deadline for payment, allowing for recovery actions if not met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>