https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261294 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the order confirming the Provisional Attachment Order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the writ petitions were not maintainable due to the availability of an alternate remedy of appeal under Section 26 of the PML Act. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in administrative orders but noted that the lack of detailed reasoning did not deprive the appellate authority of its statutory jurisdiction. The petitioners were directed to pursue remedies under Section 26 of the PML Act. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261294 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the order confirming the Provisional Attachment Order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It held that the writ petitions were not maintainable due to the availability of an alternate remedy of appeal under Section 26 of the PML Act. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in administrative orders but noted that the lack of detailed reasoning did not deprive the appellate authority of its statutory jurisdiction. The petitioners were directed to pursue remedies under Section 26 of the PML Act. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261294