<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 244 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261283</link>
    <description>Advances received from sister concerns were not taxed as deemed dividend because the recipient was not a shareholder or beneficial owner in the lender companies, so the inter-corporate receipts fell outside section 2(22)(e). Foreign travel expenditure was allowed as business expenditure because it had a direct nexus with technical and commercial requirements of the business. Repairs and replacement items were treated as revenue expenditure since they did not create a new asset or enduring capital advantage. Deduction under section 80IA was not denied for lack of SSI registration, as formal registration was not a precondition and the unit satisfied the prescribed investment limit under the applicable industrial law framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 244 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261283</link>
      <description>Advances received from sister concerns were not taxed as deemed dividend because the recipient was not a shareholder or beneficial owner in the lender companies, so the inter-corporate receipts fell outside section 2(22)(e). Foreign travel expenditure was allowed as business expenditure because it had a direct nexus with technical and commercial requirements of the business. Repairs and replacement items were treated as revenue expenditure since they did not create a new asset or enduring capital advantage. Deduction under section 80IA was not denied for lack of SSI registration, as formal registration was not a precondition and the unit satisfied the prescribed investment limit under the applicable industrial law framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>