<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds in the case. The appeals by both the assessee and the revenue were dismissed. Key points included the partial allowance of interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) and the deletion of the disallowance of interest on service tax. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing evidence to support claims and ensuring borrowed funds are used for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds in the case. The appeals by both the assessee and the revenue were dismissed. Key points included the partial allowance of interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) and the deletion of the disallowance of interest on service tax. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing evidence to support claims and ensuring borrowed funds are used for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>