https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171002 The Court held that Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights under the Constitution. The scheme framed under Chapter IV-A was found to be valid but the approval process by the State Government was deemed flawed due to a lack of natural justice. The General Manager had the authority to publish the scheme, and procedural requirements were generally met. However, the hearing by the State Government was deemed biased and prejudged. The Court quashed the scheme approval, directing a fresh enquiry with proper adherence to principles of natural justice, and parties were instructed to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2015 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171002 The Court held that Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights under the Constitution. The scheme framed under Chapter IV-A was found to be valid but the approval process by the State Government was deemed flawed due to a lack of natural justice. The General Manager had the authority to publish the scheme, and procedural requirements were generally met. However, the hearing by the State Government was deemed biased and prejudged. The Court quashed the scheme approval, directing a fresh enquiry with proper adherence to principles of natural justice, and parties were instructed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171002