https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171002 Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was analysed as a permit-regulation scheme for state transport services, not a compulsory acquisition of private transport businesses, because it cancelled and substituted permits without transferring ownership or possession of business assets, so the constitutional compensation requirement was not attracted. The text also explains that objections to an approved transport scheme under Section 68-D had to be considered through a fair and impartial hearing; the approval was treated as vitiated where the hearing process lacked natural justice. The Road Transport Corporation was described as competent to implement the scheme as successor to the State transport undertaking. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2015 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171002 Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was analysed as a permit-regulation scheme for state transport services, not a compulsory acquisition of private transport businesses, because it cancelled and substituted permits without transferring ownership or possession of business assets, so the constitutional compensation requirement was not attracted. The text also explains that objections to an approved transport scheme under Section 68-D had to be considered through a fair and impartial hearing; the approval was treated as vitiated where the hearing process lacked natural justice. The Road Transport Corporation was described as competent to implement the scheme as successor to the State transport undertaking. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171002