https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171000 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only where the trial court's view is perverse, illegal, or leads to grave miscarriage of justice; a mere alternative view is insufficient. Applying that standard, the SC held that the trial court's acquittal was a plausible view and should not have been reversed. On the evidence, the prosecution also failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a single shot caused both the fatal injury and the pellet injuries, as the medical and ballistic evidence indicated different shots from different firearms. The conviction set aside by the High Court was therefore unsustainable and the acquittal was restored. en-us Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171000 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only where the trial court's view is perverse, illegal, or leads to grave miscarriage of justice; a mere alternative view is insufficient. Applying that standard, the SC held that the trial court's acquittal was a plausible view and should not have been reversed. On the evidence, the prosecution also failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a single shot caused both the fatal injury and the pellet injuries, as the medical and ballistic evidence indicated different shots from different firearms. The conviction set aside by the High Court was therefore unsustainable and the acquittal was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171000