<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 608 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170999</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the High Court and the State Authorities, finding no illegality in the dismissal of the writ petition, the change in licensing policy, or the grant of license to the new unit. The Court held that the actions were in accordance with statutory provisions and public interest, dismissing allegations of mala fide exercise of power. The appellant&#039;s concerns regarding the impact on their sugar mill were addressed by imposed conditions. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 608 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170999</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the High Court and the State Authorities, finding no illegality in the dismissal of the writ petition, the change in licensing policy, or the grant of license to the new unit. The Court held that the actions were in accordance with statutory provisions and public interest, dismissing allegations of mala fide exercise of power. The appellant&#039;s concerns regarding the impact on their sugar mill were addressed by imposed conditions. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>