https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170998 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's judgment. It found no justification for the retrospective promotions, emphasizing that seniority should be based on the date of actual appointment. The court clarified that the 50:50 quota introduced by the 1999 amendment could not be applied retrospectively, ensuring fairness in seniority between direct appointees and promoted employees. en-us Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170998 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's judgment. It found no justification for the retrospective promotions, emphasizing that seniority should be based on the date of actual appointment. The court clarified that the 50:50 quota introduced by the 1999 amendment could not be applied retrospectively, ensuring fairness in seniority between direct appointees and promoted employees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170998