https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170995 Appeals from release orders in habeas corpus-type proceedings were treated as competent under the Government of India Act, 1935 because its appellate provision covered final High Court orders without an express exclusion. Rule 26 of the Defence of India Rules, 1939 was considered authorised by the Act's broad rule-making power, with the listed matters treated as illustrative rather than restrictive. Authenticated detention orders remained open to judicial review for non-compliance with statutory conditions: the Governor could act through ordinary executive machinery, but a routine detention direction based solely on police recommendation failed to establish the required satisfaction. Detention was therefore invalid only where that routine order applied. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:29:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170995 Appeals from release orders in habeas corpus-type proceedings were treated as competent under the Government of India Act, 1935 because its appellate provision covered final High Court orders without an express exclusion. Rule 26 of the Defence of India Rules, 1939 was considered authorised by the Act's broad rule-making power, with the listed matters treated as illustrative rather than restrictive. Authenticated detention orders remained open to judicial review for non-compliance with statutory conditions: the Governor could act through ordinary executive machinery, but a routine detention direction based solely on police recommendation failed to establish the required satisfaction. Detention was therefore invalid only where that routine order applied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170995