https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170995 The appeals were found competent, and Rule 26 was held valid under the Defence of India Act. The Governor's satisfaction under Rule 26 could be achieved through the normal executive procedures. The routine order of October 1, 1942, invalidated the detention orders for respondents Nos. 1 and 5, while the orders for respondents Nos. 3, 6, 7, and 8 were upheld as valid. The judgment advised that the appeal be allowed for respondents Nos. 3, 6, 7, and 8, and dismissed for respondents Nos. 1 and 5. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:29:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170995 The appeals were found competent, and Rule 26 was held valid under the Defence of India Act. The Governor's satisfaction under Rule 26 could be achieved through the normal executive procedures. The routine order of October 1, 1942, invalidated the detention orders for respondents Nos. 1 and 5, while the orders for respondents Nos. 3, 6, 7, and 8 were upheld as valid. The judgment advised that the appeal be allowed for respondents Nos. 3, 6, 7, and 8, and dismissed for respondents Nos. 1 and 5. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170995