https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170994 The court upheld the validity of the Model Standing Orders and affirmed the expanded jurisdiction of Certifying Authorities to modify draft Standing Orders for fairness. It clarified that deviations from Model Orders are permissible if strict compliance is impracticable. The court allowed the addition of items related to employment conditions to the Schedule. However, it invalidated provisions for retirement without suitable benefits and modified compensation rules for lay-offs. Appeals to outside authorities were deemed unauthorized, leading to the striking down of relevant Standing Orders. The court partially allowed the appeal, modifying certain Standing Orders and confirming the rest. en-us Fri, 03 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:25:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170994 The court upheld the validity of the Model Standing Orders and affirmed the expanded jurisdiction of Certifying Authorities to modify draft Standing Orders for fairness. It clarified that deviations from Model Orders are permissible if strict compliance is impracticable. The court allowed the addition of items related to employment conditions to the Schedule. However, it invalidated provisions for retirement without suitable benefits and modified compensation rules for lay-offs. Appeals to outside authorities were deemed unauthorized, leading to the striking down of relevant Standing Orders. The court partially allowed the appeal, modifying certain Standing Orders and confirming the rest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170994