<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170993</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, annulling the usufructuary mortgage bond judgments. The transaction was deemed valid, falling within the third exception to Section 35 of the Insolvency Regulation, not void against the receiver. The appellant was granted costs, to be covered by the estate in the hands of the Official Receiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 38 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170993</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, annulling the usufructuary mortgage bond judgments. The transaction was deemed valid, falling within the third exception to Section 35 of the Insolvency Regulation, not void against the receiver. The appellant was granted costs, to be covered by the estate in the hands of the Official Receiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>