<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 578 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170988</link>
    <description>Public water bodies, lake beds and submerged land held in trust cannot be diverted to private commercial tourism use where the arrangement includes reclamation or diminishes the water body. The project was also said to have proceeded without the required environmental clearance and in breach of Wetlands restrictions on reclamation and permanent construction. Disposal of municipal and development authority land was held unsustainable because the mandatory valuation and procedural requirements were not followed. Relaxation of tender eligibility and the later project revision were treated as arbitrary and contrary to public trust, making the impugned lease, licence and related arrangements liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 578 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170988</link>
      <description>Public water bodies, lake beds and submerged land held in trust cannot be diverted to private commercial tourism use where the arrangement includes reclamation or diminishes the water body. The project was also said to have proceeded without the required environmental clearance and in breach of Wetlands restrictions on reclamation and permanent construction. Disposal of municipal and development authority land was held unsustainable because the mandatory valuation and procedural requirements were not followed. Relaxation of tender eligibility and the later project revision were treated as arbitrary and contrary to public trust, making the impugned lease, licence and related arrangements liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>