<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 229 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261268</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the revision, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order and directing the Appellate Authority to expedite the appeal&#039;s decision within two months. It ordered that no recovery of the remaining 20% of the tax demand should be made from the revisionist until the appeal is decided. The judgment underscores the importance of considering updated legal precedents and ensuring fair treatment in stay applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 229 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261268</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the revision, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order and directing the Appellate Authority to expedite the appeal&#039;s decision within two months. It ordered that no recovery of the remaining 20% of the tax demand should be made from the revisionist until the appeal is decided. The judgment underscores the importance of considering updated legal precedents and ensuring fair treatment in stay applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>