<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 227 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261266</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked where the exemption issue had been interpreted differently, the assessee relied on board clarification and a bona fide understanding, and there was no proven suppression or mala fide intent. The demand therefore had to be confined to the normal period and reworked accordingly, with Cenvat credit and cum-duty benefit considered in fresh computation. Because the finding on suppression failed, the penalty had no basis and was set aside; the remaining quantification was remanded for fresh adjudication on the limited-period basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 227 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261266</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked where the exemption issue had been interpreted differently, the assessee relied on board clarification and a bona fide understanding, and there was no proven suppression or mala fide intent. The demand therefore had to be confined to the normal period and reworked accordingly, with Cenvat credit and cum-duty benefit considered in fresh computation. Because the finding on suppression failed, the penalty had no basis and was set aside; the remaining quantification was remanded for fresh adjudication on the limited-period basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>