https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261265 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant was entitled to re-credit the Cenvat amount for furnace oil used in manufacturing goods on a job work basis. The Tribunal found that the issue had been previously settled in favor of the appellant and that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply in this case. The decision emphasized the exception for inputs used as fuels and ruled that the appellant could re-credit the amount without considering unjust enrichment, subject to verification by the adjudicating authority. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261265 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant was entitled to re-credit the Cenvat amount for furnace oil used in manufacturing goods on a job work basis. The Tribunal found that the issue had been previously settled in favor of the appellant and that the principle of unjust enrichment did not apply in this case. The decision emphasized the exception for inputs used as fuels and ruled that the appellant could re-credit the amount without considering unjust enrichment, subject to verification by the adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261265