<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 221 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered a remand for a fresh consideration of the refund claim, emphasizing the examination of the correctness of the ISD invoice and the appellant&#039;s evidence regarding expenses related to the final product. The decision stressed the importance of providing detailed reasoning for any denial of refund claim and adherence to legal provisions, directing the original authority to reconsider the claim based on evidence and precedent decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 221 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered a remand for a fresh consideration of the refund claim, emphasizing the examination of the correctness of the ISD invoice and the appellant&#039;s evidence regarding expenses related to the final product. The decision stressed the importance of providing detailed reasoning for any denial of refund claim and adherence to legal provisions, directing the original authority to reconsider the claim based on evidence and precedent decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>