<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 212 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to exclude large companies from the comparability analysis based on the turnover filter, emphasizing the importance of size and economies of scale in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the arithmetic mean by excluding companies with turnovers exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the list of comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 212 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to exclude large companies from the comparability analysis based on the turnover filter, emphasizing the importance of size and economies of scale in determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the arithmetic mean by excluding companies with turnovers exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the list of comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>