<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 208 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. It ruled that the interest income earned by the appellant, acting as a nodal agency for government projects, should not be taxed as it was considered part of the grant received from the government. The Tribunal emphasized that the interest income had an overriding charge and was not the appellant&#039;s income but rather part of the government grant, following precedents where similar income was not taxed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 06:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 208 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. It ruled that the interest income earned by the appellant, acting as a nodal agency for government projects, should not be taxed as it was considered part of the grant received from the government. The Tribunal emphasized that the interest income had an overriding charge and was not the appellant&#039;s income but rather part of the government grant, following precedents where similar income was not taxed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>