<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (11) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170984</link>
    <description>Preventive detention may be sustained on a single incident where the nature of the act and surrounding circumstances reasonably disclose organised prejudicial conduct and a present likelihood of repetition. The Court treated the carrying and concealment of a large quantity of telegraph copper wires as indicating a criminal design affecting supplies and services essential to the community, and upheld the detention on that basis. It also held that discharge in the related criminal case did not invalidate the detention order, because preventive detention depends on subjective satisfaction and a separate prognosis of future conduct. No infirmity was found where the grounds were explained in Bangla, the detenue&#039;s mother tongue, and the representation was submitted in the same language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (11) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170984</link>
      <description>Preventive detention may be sustained on a single incident where the nature of the act and surrounding circumstances reasonably disclose organised prejudicial conduct and a present likelihood of repetition. The Court treated the carrying and concealment of a large quantity of telegraph copper wires as indicating a criminal design affecting supplies and services essential to the community, and upheld the detention on that basis. It also held that discharge in the related criminal case did not invalidate the detention order, because preventive detention depends on subjective satisfaction and a separate prognosis of future conduct. No infirmity was found where the grounds were explained in Bangla, the detenue&#039;s mother tongue, and the representation was submitted in the same language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>