<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170983</link>
    <description>Preventive detention may be sustained on a single prejudicial incident where the material reasonably supports the detaining authority&#039;s satisfaction that similar conduct may recur and affect essential supplies and services. Here, removal of fish plates from a running track and the resulting disruption of train services was treated as sufficient material for detention. The note also states that the State Government must consider a detenu&#039;s representation before forwarding it to the Advisory Board, and that this sequence did not invalidate the detention because the representation was first examined and then placed before the Board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170983</link>
      <description>Preventive detention may be sustained on a single prejudicial incident where the material reasonably supports the detaining authority&#039;s satisfaction that similar conduct may recur and affect essential supplies and services. Here, removal of fish plates from a running track and the resulting disruption of train services was treated as sufficient material for detention. The note also states that the State Government must consider a detenu&#039;s representation before forwarding it to the Advisory Board, and that this sequence did not invalidate the detention because the representation was first examined and then placed before the Board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>