https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170983 Preventive detention may rest on a single incident where removal of railway fish plates and disruption of train services reasonably support satisfaction that essential community supplies and services may be prejudicially affected again. Such conduct directly affects essential services, so one occurrence need not make the detaining material insufficient. The State Government must consider the detenu's representation before forwarding it to the Advisory Board; prior consideration and rejection do not invalidate detention where the Board subsequently considers the matter and submits its report. The detention order was upheld. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:58:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170983 Preventive detention may rest on a single incident where removal of railway fish plates and disruption of train services reasonably support satisfaction that essential community supplies and services may be prejudicially affected again. Such conduct directly affects essential services, so one occurrence need not make the detaining material insufficient. The State Government must consider the detenu's representation before forwarding it to the Advisory Board; prior consideration and rejection do not invalidate detention where the Board subsequently considers the matter and submits its report. The detention order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170983