<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 567 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170981</link>
    <description>An identical reference on the disallowance of interest for advances made to subsidiary companies without charging interest had already been decided in favour of the assessee, and the High Court followed that binding view for the same assessment year issue. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance was therefore upheld, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:28:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 567 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170981</link>
      <description>An identical reference on the disallowance of interest for advances made to subsidiary companies without charging interest had already been decided in favour of the assessee, and the High Court followed that binding view for the same assessment year issue. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance was therefore upheld, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>