<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (9) TMI 143 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170979</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision to include income from an advertisement hoarding on a building&#039;s roof in determining the rateable value. The assessing authority correctly increased the rateable value considering the additional income from the advertisement, as it affects the hypothetical rent a tenant would offer. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the enhancement of the annual rent based on the advertisement income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (9) TMI 143 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170979</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision to include income from an advertisement hoarding on a building&#039;s roof in determining the rateable value. The assessing authority correctly increased the rateable value considering the additional income from the advertisement, as it affects the hypothetical rent a tenant would offer. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the enhancement of the annual rent based on the advertisement income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>