<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 196 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of direct evidence to establish the alleged violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in imposing tax penalties and the need for a factual basis for such actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 196 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of direct evidence to establish the alleged violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence in imposing tax penalties and the need for a factual basis for such actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>