https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170973 The Supreme Court held that the mere presence of Dhapubai at the adoption ceremonies did not constitute her consent, rendering the adoption of Ghisalal by Gopalji invalid. Consequently, Ghisalal had no standing to challenge the Gift Deeds, Will, and Sale Deed, leading to the dismissal of his claim to the properties. The Court set aside the judgments of the trial court, lower appellate court, and High Court, ultimately dismissing Ghisalal's suit. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170973 The Supreme Court held that the mere presence of Dhapubai at the adoption ceremonies did not constitute her consent, rendering the adoption of Ghisalal by Gopalji invalid. Consequently, Ghisalal had no standing to challenge the Gift Deeds, Will, and Sale Deed, leading to the dismissal of his claim to the properties. The Court set aside the judgments of the trial court, lower appellate court, and High Court, ultimately dismissing Ghisalal's suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170973