<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 192 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, setting aside the dismissal by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a delay in depositing the pre-deposit amount. The Tribunal condoned the 6-day delay, emphasizing the importance of adhering to timelines but also ensuring justice by granting the appellant an opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 192 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, setting aside the dismissal by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a delay in depositing the pre-deposit amount. The Tribunal condoned the 6-day delay, emphasizing the importance of adhering to timelines but also ensuring justice by granting the appellant an opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>