<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (5) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170972</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court revoked the special leave to appeal granted to the tenant due to his deliberate withholding of material facts and misleading the court. The court emphasized the importance of honesty and full disclosure in petitions for special leave and underscored the discretionary nature of its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. The tenant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 11:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (5) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170972</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court revoked the special leave to appeal granted to the tenant due to his deliberate withholding of material facts and misleading the court. The court emphasized the importance of honesty and full disclosure in petitions for special leave and underscored the discretionary nature of its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. The tenant was ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>