https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170971 Arbitrability turned on whether disputes under company oppression petitions fell within written arbitration agreements and whether there was commonality of parties and subject matter; where several claims could be adjudicated independently of the SHA/TKA and requisite party commonality was absent, referral under arbitration law was not required, so the Board retained jurisdiction. Separately, interim reliefs were granted in part using corporate-preservation principles: mutual status quo on shareholdings, petitioner authorised to resume supplies, and appointment of one nominee as Joint Managing Director subject to protective conditions to safeguard the company pending final determination. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170971 Arbitrability turned on whether disputes under company oppression petitions fell within written arbitration agreements and whether there was commonality of parties and subject matter; where several claims could be adjudicated independently of the SHA/TKA and requisite party commonality was absent, referral under arbitration law was not required, so the Board retained jurisdiction. Separately, interim reliefs were granted in part using corporate-preservation principles: mutual status quo on shareholdings, petitioner authorised to resume supplies, and appointment of one nominee as Joint Managing Director subject to protective conditions to safeguard the company pending final determination. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170971