https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170968 The court concluded that the original plaintiff and his heirs could not maintain the suits without impleading Alagappa or his heirs. The alienation of the huq right was invalid, and the concept of de facto trusteeship did not confer any legal rights on the original plaintiff. The joint nature of trusteeship required all trustees to be parties to the suit. The plaintiffs' request to join necessary parties at a late stage was denied, and the suits were dismissed. en-us Fri, 06 May 1938 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 11:21:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170968 The court concluded that the original plaintiff and his heirs could not maintain the suits without impleading Alagappa or his heirs. The alienation of the huq right was invalid, and the concept of de facto trusteeship did not confer any legal rights on the original plaintiff. The joint nature of trusteeship required all trustees to be parties to the suit. The plaintiffs' request to join necessary parties at a late stage was denied, and the suits were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 1938 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=170968