https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261227 The Tribunal reaffirmed its inherent power to grant stay despite the abolition of Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that the removal of this section did not diminish its authority to extend stays, especially when delays were not attributable to the appellants. The Tribunal rejected the Departmental Representative's argument that it no longer had the power to grant an extension of stay and extended the stay granted earlier due to delays not caused by the appellants. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2015 06:44:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261227 The Tribunal reaffirmed its inherent power to grant stay despite the abolition of Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that the removal of this section did not diminish its authority to extend stays, especially when delays were not attributable to the appellants. The Tribunal rejected the Departmental Representative's argument that it no longer had the power to grant an extension of stay and extended the stay granted earlier due to delays not caused by the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261227