<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 181 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261220</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the eligibility for Modvat Credit on Sulphuric Acid used in the manufacturing process, including the production of Spent Sulphuric Acid. The Court determined that Spent Sulphuric Acid was a by-product, not a final product, entitling the assessee to the duty credit. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed based on legal provisions and judicial precedents, affirming the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 181 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261220</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the eligibility for Modvat Credit on Sulphuric Acid used in the manufacturing process, including the production of Spent Sulphuric Acid. The Court determined that Spent Sulphuric Acid was a by-product, not a final product, entitling the assessee to the duty credit. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed based on legal provisions and judicial precedents, affirming the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>