<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 162 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that there was a transfer of capital asset in the assessment year, resulting in capital gain. However, the A.O. was directed to reconsider the computation of capital gain and eligibility for deductions in accordance with the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s findings on fair market value and indexed cost of acquisition, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee. The appeal by the department was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 162 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that there was a transfer of capital asset in the assessment year, resulting in capital gain. However, the A.O. was directed to reconsider the computation of capital gain and eligibility for deductions in accordance with the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s findings on fair market value and indexed cost of acquisition, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee. The appeal by the department was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>